What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
Communicating with Sugarman Rogers through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
Partner John G. O’Neill was quoted by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly in the article “Law firm’s insurer must defend ex-partners’ counterclaims.”
An excerpt:
A law firm’s liability insurer was obligated to defend counterclaims brought by former partners in response to the firm’s allegations that the partners unlawfully took proprietary databases, laptops and iPads when they left to start a competing firm, a U.S. District Court judge has determined. The counterclaims alleged that the plaintiff, Governo Law Firm, tortiously interfered with the departing attorneys’ client relationships by refusing to release client file materials and property when those clients followed them to their new firm.
Boston business and insurance litigator John G. O’Neill said Wolf’s ruling, at first blush, surprised him as it arose in the context of a law firm breakup and appeared to involve competition between former partners for clients — seemingly a business-related activity that would not be covered.
“But the distinction can be difficult, especially when, as here, clients may be impacted by the lawyers’ alleged conduct,” he said. “As the court pointed out, it implicated ethical rules and specialized knowledge of the lawyers, so you can see where it would be a difficult line to draw in terms of distinguishing between [business conduct and legal services].”
Read the full article here.
|
|
John G. O’Neill quoted by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly |
Date: October 16, 2018 |
Publication |
John G. O'Neill |
Related Services: Insurance & Reinsurance |
||
|
Partner John G. O’Neill was quoted by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly in the article “Law firm’s insurer must defend ex-partners’ counterclaims.” An excerpt: A law firm’s liability insurer was obligated to defend counterclaims brought by former partners in response to the firm’s allegations that the partners unlawfully took proprietary databases, laptops and iPads when they left to start a competing firm, a U.S. District Court judge has determined. The counterclaims alleged that the plaintiff, Governo Law Firm, tortiously interfered with the departing attorneys’ client relationships by refusing to release client file materials and property when those clients followed them to their new firm. Boston business and insurance litigator John G. O’Neill said Wolf’s ruling, at first blush, surprised him as it arose in the context of a law firm breakup and appeared to involve competition between former partners for clients — seemingly a business-related activity that would not be covered. “But the distinction can be difficult, especially when, as here, clients may be impacted by the lawyers’ alleged conduct,” he said. “As the court pointed out, it implicated ethical rules and specialized knowledge of the lawyers, so you can see where it would be a difficult line to draw in terms of distinguishing between [business conduct and legal services].” Read the full article here. |
Related People |
|||
John G. O'NeillPartner617.227.3030oneill@sugarmanrogers.com |
|||