What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
By contacting Sugarman Rogers through this website, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
If you are not already a client of Sugarman Rogers, communicating with the firm through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement. We cannot guarantee whether or when we may agree to accept your case.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
June 11, 2012
Sugarman Rogers partner Tony Agudelo obtained summary judgment in a products liability asbestos case that had been brought against an American distributor of foreign motor vehicles. The plaintiff had claimed that her husband had contracted mesothelioma and died as a result of his work on certain automobiles and automotive replacement parts. The plaintiff alleged that our client was negligent and failed to warn of the hazards of working with the defendant’s products. Her settlement demand was $2.2 million, but Tony won a dismissal of the case against its client after convincingly arguing that its client was neither negligent, nor had improperly failed to warn, nor had caused the plaintiff’s husband’s illness.
|
|
Summary judgment win in products liability asbestos case |
Date: June 11, 2012 |
Press Release |
Anthony V. Agudelo |
Related Services: Product Liability |
||
|
Sugarman Rogers partner Tony Agudelo obtained summary judgment in a products liability asbestos case that had been brought against an American distributor of foreign motor vehicles. The plaintiff had claimed that her husband had contracted mesothelioma and died as a result of his work on certain automobiles and automotive replacement parts. The plaintiff alleged that our client was negligent and failed to warn of the hazards of working with the defendant’s products. Her settlement demand was $2.2 million, but Tony won a dismissal of the case against its client after convincingly arguing that its client was neither negligent, nor had improperly failed to warn, nor had caused the plaintiff’s husband’s illness. |
Related People |
|||
Anthony V. AgudeloPartner617.227.3030agudelo@sugarmanrogers.com |
|||