What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
By contacting Sugarman Rogers through this website, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
If you are not already a client of Sugarman Rogers, communicating with the firm through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement. We cannot guarantee whether or when we may agree to accept your case.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
Based on papers filed by Sugarman Rogers’ William Boesch, a superior court judge has dismissed a widow’s claim that the accountant for her late husband’s estate improperly assisted the executor, her stepson, in depriving her of her rightful share of income and assets from the estate. The court agreed with William’s argument that any claim against the accountant was barred by the statute of limitations, as the events recited in the complaint clearly would have put the widow on notice of the essential facts more than three years before she filed suit.
|
|
Early victory for accountant in malpractice case |
Date: March 5, 2015 |
Press Release |
William L. Boesch |
Related Services: Professional Liability |
||
|
Based on papers filed by Sugarman Rogers’ William Boesch, a superior court judge has dismissed a widow’s claim that the accountant for her late husband’s estate improperly assisted the executor, her stepson, in depriving her of her rightful share of income and assets from the estate. The court agreed with William’s argument that any claim against the accountant was barred by the statute of limitations, as the events recited in the complaint clearly would have put the widow on notice of the essential facts more than three years before she filed suit. |
Related People |
|||
William L. BoeschPartner617.227.3030boesch@sugarmanrogers.com |
|||