What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
Communicating with Sugarman Rogers through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
In May, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled that the Global Warming Solutions Act requires aggregate, as opposed to rate-based, greenhouse gas emission limits for multiple categories of emitting sources.
Join Partner Dylan Sanders along with the Conservation Law Foundation’s Jennifer Rushlow at a Boston Bar Association presentation to learn about the history of the case, the decision, and what it may mean going forward.
Click here to register.
|
|
Dylan Sanders to speak at BBA program: “Supreme Judicial Court Decision in the Global Warming Solutions Act Case: A Litigation Update” |
Date: June 14, 2016 |
Event |
|
Related Services: Environmental & Energy Law |
||
|
In May, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) ruled that the Global Warming Solutions Act requires aggregate, as opposed to rate-based, greenhouse gas emission limits for multiple categories of emitting sources. Join Partner Dylan Sanders along with the Conservation Law Foundation’s Jennifer Rushlow at a Boston Bar Association presentation to learn about the history of the case, the decision, and what it may mean going forward. Click here to register. |
Related People |
|||
Dylan SandersPartner617.227.3030[email protected] |
|||