What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
By contacting Sugarman Rogers through this website, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
If you are not already a client of Sugarman Rogers, communicating with the firm through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement. We cannot guarantee whether or when we may agree to accept your case.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
May 8, 2015
Sugarman Rogers partner Anthony V. Agudelo secured a victory in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on behalf of an Sugarman Rogers client in a product liability case. The plaintiff had claimed that a drill, battery, or battery charger had caused a fire leading to significant property damage. Sugarman Rogers won a dismissal of the case in the United States District Court, and that dismissal was recently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The Court of Appeals found no evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that any product made by Sugarman Rogers’ client caused the fire.
See the Appeals Court Decision here.
|
|
First Circuit win for Sugarman Rogers client in product liability case |
Date: May 8, 2015 |
Case Report |
Anthony V. Agudelo |
Related Services: Product Liability |
||
|
Sugarman Rogers partner Anthony V. Agudelo secured a victory in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on behalf of an Sugarman Rogers client in a product liability case. The plaintiff had claimed that a drill, battery, or battery charger had caused a fire leading to significant property damage. Sugarman Rogers won a dismissal of the case in the United States District Court, and that dismissal was recently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The Court of Appeals found no evidence to support the plaintiff’s claim that any product made by Sugarman Rogers’ client caused the fire. See the Appeals Court Decision here. |
Related People |
|||
Anthony V. AgudeloPartner617.227.3030agudelo@sugarmanrogers.com |
|||