What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
By contacting Sugarman Rogers through this website, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
If you are not already a client of Sugarman Rogers, communicating with the firm through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement. We cannot guarantee whether or when we may agree to accept your case.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
February 8, 2018
Sugarman Rogers partner, Kate Cook, presented an oral argument to the Supreme Judicial Court on February 6, 2018 in a much-watched case concerning a proposed initiative petition to impose a new tax on high earners that would create a revenue stream for transportation and education needs. Kate represents the original signers of the initiative petition, who contend that the petition satisfies all applicable constitutional requirements. The SJC argument by all parties’ counsel can be viewed on-line here.
Read more about the SJC case concerning this initiative petition:
|
|
Kate Cook presented an oral argument to the Supreme Judicial Court |
Date: February 8, 2018 |
News |
Lisa C. Goodheart, Kate R. Cook |
Related Services: Government Law |
||
|
Sugarman Rogers partner, Kate Cook, presented an oral argument to the Supreme Judicial Court on February 6, 2018 in a much-watched case concerning a proposed initiative petition to impose a new tax on high earners that would create a revenue stream for transportation and education needs. Kate represents the original signers of the initiative petition, who contend that the petition satisfies all applicable constitutional requirements. The SJC argument by all parties’ counsel can be viewed on-line here. Read more about the SJC case concerning this initiative petition:
|
Related People |
|||
Lisa C. GoodheartPartner617.227.3030goodheart@sugarmanrogers.com |
Kate R. CookPartner617.227.3030cook@sugarmanrogers.com |
||