What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
What can we help you find? Enter your search above.
Communicating with Sugarman Rogers through this website does not create an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of our attorneys. Our decision as to whether and on what terms we may agree to represent a client involves consideration of a variety of factors, discussion with the prospective client, and, where appropriate, a written engagement agreement.
Please do not use this form of communication to transmit any private, personally identifying, or other confidential information. We cannot guarantee the confidentiality or security of this means of communication.
October 16, 2013
The Massachusetts Appeals Court has dismissed an appeal by the owner of a defunct corporate tenant in a case in which Sugarman Rogers partner John O’Neill succeeded in piercing the corporate veil and obtaining a personal judgment against the owner on behalf of their landlord-client. John successfully argued, on a motion for summary judgment in the superior court, that the owner’s conduct–failing to properly fund the company, commingling of assets, failing to follow corporate formalities and maintain proper records, and use of the corporate form to effectively defraud the landlord–justified imposition of personal liability for the corporate obligation.
Read the summary judgment decision.
|
|
Sugarman Rogers lawyers secure personal judgment against owner of defunct corporation |
Date: October 16, 2013 |
Case Report |
John G. O'Neill |
Related Services: Real Estate Litigation |
||
|
The Massachusetts Appeals Court has dismissed an appeal by the owner of a defunct corporate tenant in a case in which Sugarman Rogers partner John O’Neill succeeded in piercing the corporate veil and obtaining a personal judgment against the owner on behalf of their landlord-client. John successfully argued, on a motion for summary judgment in the superior court, that the owner’s conduct–failing to properly fund the company, commingling of assets, failing to follow corporate formalities and maintain proper records, and use of the corporate form to effectively defraud the landlord–justified imposition of personal liability for the corporate obligation. Read the summary judgment decision. |
Related People |
|||
John G. O'NeillPartner617.227.3030oneill@sugarmanrogers.com |
|||